Richard Morgan – University of Gothenburg

The Politics of Security: When Counterinsurgency Works and When It Doesn’t — Evidence From India

How and under what conditions do counterinsurgency security operations — presence patrols, in particular — influence noncombatant support preferences? I argue that in revolutionary insurgencies, security operations can help the government reestablish law and order and secure the population. However, in ethno-separatist insurgencies, security operations can fuel ethnic group provocation, triggering an ethnic security dilemma. Therefore, I posit that security operations will decrease the likelihood that noncombatants will express support the government in ethno-separatist insurgencies relative to revolutionary insurgencies. I find support for this proposition using data from two village-level surveys that measure the presence of counter-insurgents patrols around and the support preferences of 71 villages in the Bodoland ethno-separatist conflict areas of Assam, India and 124 villages in the districts of Bihar, India, affected by a revolutionary insurgent group ― the Communist Party of India – Maoist. These data suggest that security operations can have heterogeneous effects on noncombatant support.



We use both our own and third-party cookies to enhance our services and to offer you the content that most suits your preferences by analysing your browsing habits. Your continued use of the site means that you accept these cookies. You may change your settings and obtain more information here. Accept